lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: NULL pointer dereference at blk_drain_queue
On 06/14/2012 03:20 PM, Asias He wrote:
> On 06/14/2012 05:42 PM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> On 06/14/2012 11:16 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 06/14/2012 11:04 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> with today's -next I'm (reproducibly) getting this while updating packages:
>>>> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null)
>>>> IP: [<ffffffff8108cd16>] __wake_up_common+0x26/0x90
>>>> PGD 463f1067 PUD 463f2067 PMD 0
>>>> Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
>>>> CPU 1
>>>> Modules linked in:
>>>> Pid: 2711, comm: kworker/1:0 Not tainted 3.5.0-rc2-next-20120614_64+
>>>> #1752 Bochs Bochs
>>>> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8108cd16>] [<ffffffff8108cd16>]
>>>> __wake_up_common+0x26/0x90
>>>> RSP: 0018:ffff880047221cb0 EFLAGS: 00010082
>>>> RAX: 0000000000000086 RBX: ffff880046350888 RCX: 0000000000000000
>>>> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000003 RDI: ffff880046350888
>>>> RBP: ffff880047221cf0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00000001000c0009
>>>> R10: ffff880047804480 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff880046350890
>>>> R13: 0000000000000003 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000003
>>>> FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff880049700000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>>>> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
>>>> CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000045ced000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
>>>> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
>>>> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
>>>> Process kworker/1:0 (pid: 2711, threadinfo ffff880047220000, task
>>>> ffff8800435bc5c0)
>>>> Stack:
>>>> 000000004628da68 0000000000000000 ffff88004970d340 ffff880046350888
>>>> 0000000000000086 0000000000000003 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
>>>> ffff880047221d30 ffffffff8108d9a3 ffff88004970d340 ffff880046350848
>>>> Call Trace:
>>>> [<ffffffff8108d9a3>] __wake_up+0x43/0x70
>>>> [<ffffffff81267f96>] blk_drain_queue+0xf6/0x120
>>>> [<ffffffff8126803f>] blk_cleanup_queue+0x7f/0xd0
>>>> [<ffffffff814a9a80>] md_free+0x50/0x70
>>>> [<ffffffff8127b3c2>] kobject_cleanup+0x82/0x1b0
>>>> [<ffffffff8127b24b>] kobject_put+0x2b/0x60
>>>> [<ffffffff814a97ef>] mddev_delayed_delete+0x2f/0x40
>>>> [<ffffffff8107e1ab>] process_one_work+0x11b/0x3f0
>>>> [<ffffffff814a97c0>] ? restart_array+0xc0/0xc0
>>>> [<ffffffff8107f94e>] worker_thread+0x12e/0x340
>>>> [<ffffffff8107f820>] ? manage_workers.isra.29+0x1f0/0x1f0
>>>> [<ffffffff81084e1e>] kthread+0x8e/0xa0
>>>> [<ffffffff8160add4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
>>>> [<ffffffff81084d90>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70
>>>> [<ffffffff8160add0>] ? gs_change+0xb/0xb
>>>> Code: 80 00 00 00 00 55 48 89 e5 41 57 41 89 f7 41 56 41 89 ce 41 55 41
>>>> 54 4c 8d 67 08 53 48 83 ec 18 89 55 c4 48 8b 57 08 4c 89 45 c8 <4c> 8b
>>>> 2a 48 8d 42 e8 49 83 ed 18 49 39 d4 75 0d eb 40 0f 1f 84
>>>
>>> It's a bug in local commit bc85cf83, for stacked devices we have not
>>> initialized the wait queues. So the below should fix it, as would always
>>> initializing all queue structures even for the partial use case.
>>>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
>>> index b477fa0..93eb3e4 100644
>>> --- a/block/blk-core.c
>>> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
>>> @@ -415,10 +415,12 @@ void blk_drain_queue(struct request_queue *q, bool drain_all)
>>> * allocation path, so the wakeup chaining is lost and we're
>>> * left with hung waiters. We need to wake up those waiters.
>>> */
>>> - spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
>>> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(q->rq.wait); i++)
>>> - wake_up_all(&q->rq.wait[i]);
>>> - spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
>>> + if (q->request_fn) {
>>> + spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
>>> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(q->rq.wait); i++)
>>> + wake_up_all(&q->rq.wait[i]);
>>> + spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
>>> + }
>>
>> Yes, that fixed it.
>
> Jiri, good to hear this fixes for you. BTW. How do you trigger this
> issue?
>
> Jens, do you prefer to fix it up in your tree yourself or wait a patch
> from me?

I will fixup the existing patch, so we don't have this problem in a
bisection point after it's merged.

--
Jens Axboe



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-06-14 16:01    [W:0.064 / U:0.748 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site