[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH V5 0/13] perf: Intel uncore pmu counting support

* Andi Kleen <> wrote:

> "Yan, Zheng" <> writes:
> > Peter suggests keeping the uncore names as they're listed in the intel
> > doc. For Sandybirdge-EP, uncore names are something like: Cbo, iMC, QPI.
> > I think Uncore_Cbo_0 appears better than uncore_Cbo_0
> How about a case insensitive match for the sysfs directories?
> [...]

That's idiotic, avoidable lookup complexity.

> [...] That can be implemented in user land with nftw(). Since
> sysfs is all virtual it should not be too expensive, as long
> as you only walk the pmu parts.
> I think that would be most user friendly.

It would be most idiotic, stop suggesting crap.

Why not rot13 it as well? Could be decoded in user-space as well
with some helpers. Hey, md5 checksum it too.



 \ /
  Last update: 2012-06-13 10:21    [W:0.097 / U:8.844 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site