lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH V5 0/13] perf: Intel uncore pmu counting support

* Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:

> "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@intel.com> writes:
>
> > Peter suggests keeping the uncore names as they're listed in the intel
> > doc. For Sandybirdge-EP, uncore names are something like: Cbo, iMC, QPI.
> > I think Uncore_Cbo_0 appears better than uncore_Cbo_0
>
> How about a case insensitive match for the sysfs directories?
> [...]

That's idiotic, avoidable lookup complexity.

> [...] That can be implemented in user land with nftw(). Since
> sysfs is all virtual it should not be too expensive, as long
> as you only walk the pmu parts.
>
> I think that would be most user friendly.

It would be most idiotic, stop suggesting crap.

Why not rot13 it as well? Could be decoded in user-space as well
with some helpers. Hey, md5 checksum it too.

Thanks,

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-06-13 10:21    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site