[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH V5 0/13] perf: Intel uncore pmu counting support

    * Andi Kleen <> wrote:

    > "Yan, Zheng" <> writes:
    > > Peter suggests keeping the uncore names as they're listed in the intel
    > > doc. For Sandybirdge-EP, uncore names are something like: Cbo, iMC, QPI.
    > > I think Uncore_Cbo_0 appears better than uncore_Cbo_0
    > How about a case insensitive match for the sysfs directories?
    > [...]

    That's idiotic, avoidable lookup complexity.

    > [...] That can be implemented in user land with nftw(). Since
    > sysfs is all virtual it should not be too expensive, as long
    > as you only walk the pmu parts.
    > I think that would be most user friendly.

    It would be most idiotic, stop suggesting crap.

    Why not rot13 it as well? Could be decoded in user-space as well
    with some helpers. Hey, md5 checksum it too.



     \ /
      Last update: 2012-06-13 10:21    [W:0.023 / U:4.288 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site