Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 13 Jun 2012 09:44:12 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH V5 0/13] perf: Intel uncore pmu counting support |
| |
* Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@intel.com> writes: > > > Peter suggests keeping the uncore names as they're listed in the intel > > doc. For Sandybirdge-EP, uncore names are something like: Cbo, iMC, QPI. > > I think Uncore_Cbo_0 appears better than uncore_Cbo_0 > > How about a case insensitive match for the sysfs directories? > [...]
That's idiotic, avoidable lookup complexity.
> [...] That can be implemented in user land with nftw(). Since > sysfs is all virtual it should not be too expensive, as long > as you only walk the pmu parts. > > I think that would be most user friendly.
It would be most idiotic, stop suggesting crap.
Why not rot13 it as well? Could be decoded in user-space as well with some helpers. Hey, md5 checksum it too.
Thanks,
Ingo
| |