lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 0/4] DT clock bindings
    Peter,

    On 06/13/2012 10:26 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
    > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 04:41:47PM +0200, Rob Herring wrote:
    >> From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
    >>
    >> This series defines clock bindings for Device-Tree and adds kernel
    >> support using the common clock infrastructure. The last patch enables
    >> DT clock support for the Calxeda Highbank platform.
    >>
    >> I'm posting this again to solicit further review. There has been some
    >> discussion[1], but no definite path forward. This series is not changed
    >> from the last post other than rebasing to v3.5-rc2.
    >>
    >> Rob
    >>
    >> [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-May/100932.html
    >>
    >
    > How would this binding work for clocks which can take a spinlock pointer as a
    > init parameter (eg. clk-gate).

    Other than fixed clocks, this makes no attempt at generic bindings.
    There is still per clock init required which can allocate a spinlock if
    necessary. If you look at the highbank code, it would be trivial to
    initialize spinlocks as needed.

    Rob

    > Cheers,
    >
    > Peter.


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-06-13 21:01    [W:0.025 / U:0.196 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site