lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] RAS: Add a tracepoint for reporting memory controller events
    On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 06:21:29PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote:
    > But we need to make sure that user space can actually run. That's the
    > motivation behind the CMCI disable patches. Since Intel broadcasts
    > CMCI to all cpus on a socket - a CMCI storm on a single socket machine
    > will stop any user code from running.

    Uuh, that doesn't sound good. Can't you guys make the CMCI run on one
    CPU only? I mean, it is a single CECC, no need to stop all cores on the
    socket for it, right?

    Arguably, it'll be best if the core that sees the CECC fires the CMCI
    too and the others continue on their merry way.

    > I'd make one small change to what you said:
    >
    > The kernel's job is to report enough error information that user space
    > can make an accurate assessment of the source of the error.
    >
    > I.e. "enough" is less than "as many errors as it possibly can".

    Ok, I see what you mean.

    --
    Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

    Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
    Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
    GM: Alberto Bozzo
    Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
    HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-06-02 01:21    [W:0.023 / U:62.708 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site