Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Wed, 09 May 2012 20:35:34 +0100 | | From | Pedro Alves <> | | Subject | Re: ptrace.2: PTRACE_KILL needs a stopped process too |
| |
On 05/09/2012 04:09 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> probably not that big of a deal, but the reason i like using > ptrace(PTRACE_KILL) over a raw kill() is that you are less likely to kill the > wrong process by accident. maybe not that big of a deal in practice though.
And you can do tgkill instead. It was specifically invented to handle the reuse case.
-- Pedro Alves
|  |