[lkml]   [2012]   [May]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: vfs: INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected
    On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 07:13:29PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
    > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Al Viro <> wrote:
    > > If that's _all_ that happened, I'm not particulary
    > > concerned; it's not pretty, but saying "thou shalt not grab ->cred_guard_mutex
    > > anywhere in ->read() on anything that has exec bits or might get one" is
    > > not too terrible.  If that's something else, though, we might have a real
    > > problem...
    > That's probably the case. The proc file got chmodded and exec'ed.
    > Can we do something to eliminate this false positive though? I can't
    > think of anything nice...
    > btw,
    > I've never seen this issue before, even though I run same tests for a
    > while now. What could have triggered it now?

    Assuming you're running trinity du-jour, I only added fuzzing of execve yesterday.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2012-05-09 21:21    [W:0.022 / U:39.440 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site