Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 09 May 2012 17:17:21 +0300 | From | Avi Kivity <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] bitops: add _local bitops |
| |
On 05/09/2012 04:45 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > +Local versions of the bitmask operations are also provided. They are used in > +contexts where the operations need to be performed atomically with respect to > +the local CPU, but no other CPU accesses the bitmask. This assumption makes it > +possible to avoid the need for SMP protection and use less expensive atomic > +operations in the implementation. > +They have names similar to the above bitmask operation interfaces, > +except that _local is sufficed to the interface name.
suffixed (better: appended)
-- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
| |