[lkml]   [2012]   [May]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Handling of modular boards
    Dear Arnd,

    In message <> you wrote:
    > One idea that I've heard before is to put device tree fragments into the
    > kernel and dynamically add them to the device tree that was passed by the
    > boot loader whenever we detect the presence of a specific device.
    > This obviously means it works only for boards using DT for booting, but
    > it allows us to use some infrastructure that we already have.
    > Another idea was to put all the possible extensions into the device tree
    > for a given board and disable them by default, putting it into the
    > responsibility of the boot loader to enable the one that is actually
    > being used. This has serious scalibility problems when there are many
    > possible extensions and also relies more on the boot loader than I would
    > like.

    On the other hand, some of the issues we're trying to solve here
    for the kernel are also present in the boot loader, so this needs to
    do this anyway - whether by inserting new or modifying (enabling or
    disabling) existing properties in the DT is not really relevant here.

    Best regards,

    Wolfgang Denk

    DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
    HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
    Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email:
    Our business is run on trust. We trust you will pay in advance.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2012-05-04 23:01    [W:0.023 / U:37.288 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site