[lkml]   [2012]   [May]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] x86 mce: use new printk recursion disabling interface
    On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 11:08 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
    > On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:07:59AM +0800, ShuoX Liu wrote:
    > > Boris,
    > > I checked code and found some other functions in do_machine_check() also
    > > would printk something. Such as add_taint(). So i think we'd better
    > > place the recursion check at the beginning and the end of
    > > do_machine_check(). Also more printks later(maybe) added will benefit
    > > from this. Do you agree?
    > I'm not sure we want to disable printk recursion for add_taint() - it
    > doesn't spit out any useful information wrt MCE so we could ignore it.
    add_taint might be not a good case here. We could move the recursion check
    flag setting around mce_panic.

    > Btw, I forgot to ask: this printk recursion disabling, do you have a
    > real usecase where you don't get the MCE info in dmesg and with your
    > patch it works or is this purely hypothetical?
    We hit it when running a MTBF testing on a Android atom mobile.


     \ /
      Last update: 2012-05-31 03:21    [W:2.415 / U:0.148 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site