lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [May]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/6] mempolicy memory corruption fixlet
    On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 01:50:02PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
    > On Wed, 30 May 2012, Andi Kleen wrote:
    >
    > > I always regretted that cpusets were no done with custom node lists.
    > > That would have been much cleaner and also likely faster than what we have.
    >
    > Could shared memory policies ignore cpuset constraints?

    Only if noone uses cpusets as a "security" mechanism, just for a "soft policy"
    Even with soft policy you could well break someone's setup.

    Maybe there are some better ways to do that now with memcg, not fully sure.

    -Andi
    --
    ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-05-30 22:01    [W:3.954 / U:0.056 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site