Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 30 May 2012 21:32:34 +0200 | From | Andi Kleen <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/6] mempolicy memory corruption fixlet |
| |
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 01:50:02PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Wed, 30 May 2012, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > I always regretted that cpusets were no done with custom node lists. > > That would have been much cleaner and also likely faster than what we have. > > Could shared memory policies ignore cpuset constraints?
Only if noone uses cpusets as a "security" mechanism, just for a "soft policy" Even with soft policy you could well break someone's setup.
Maybe there are some better ways to do that now with memcg, not fully sure.
-Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
| |