Messages in this thread | | | From | KOSAKI Motohiro <> | Date | Wed, 30 May 2012 06:49:57 -0400 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] cpumask: add a few comments of cpumask functions |
| |
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> wrote: > On 05/29/2012 09:16 AM, Alex Shi wrote: > >> >>>>> s/return/Returns >>>>> >>>>> What do you mean by "old" cpumask? >>>> >>>> Thanks for comments! >>>> Should be "the old bitmap of cpumask"? >>>> >>> >>> >>> No, there is no "old" or "new" cpumask here because this function doesn't >>> change the cpumask. It just checks if that bit is set. >>> So something like: >>> Returns 1 if 'cpu' is set in 'cpumask', else returns 0. >>> >> >> >> >> Sure, thanks! and comments changed again following your style. >> Is the following new update patch ok? > > > Any further comments for this patch? :)
Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
| |