lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [May]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    Date
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] cpumask: add a few comments of cpumask functions
    On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> wrote:
    > On 05/29/2012 09:16 AM, Alex Shi wrote:
    >
    >>
    >>>>> s/return/Returns
    >>>>>
    >>>>> What do you mean by "old" cpumask?
    >>>>
    >>>> Thanks for comments!
    >>>> Should be "the old bitmap of cpumask"?
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> No, there is no "old" or "new" cpumask here because this function doesn't
    >>> change the cpumask. It just checks if that bit is set.
    >>> So something like:
    >>> Returns 1 if 'cpu' is set in 'cpumask', else returns 0.
    >>>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> Sure, thanks! and comments changed again following your style.
    >> Is the following new update patch ok?
    >
    >
    > Any further comments for this patch? :)

    Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-05-30 13:41    [W:0.027 / U:0.200 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site