[lkml]   [2012]   [May]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectMaking ARM multiplatform kernels DT-only?
    Hi everyone,

    I've been discussing multiplatform kernels with a few people recently,
    and we will have a lot of discussion sessions about this at Linaro
    Connect in Hong Kong.

    One question that came up repeatedly is whether we should support all
    possible board files for each platform in a multiplatform kernel,
    or just the ones that are already using DT probing. I would like
    to get a quick poll of opinions on that and I've tried to put those
    people on Cc that would be most impacted by this, i.e. the maintainers
    for platforms that have both DT and non-DT board files at the moment.

    My feeling is that we should just mandate DT booting for multiplatform
    kernels, because it significantly reduces the combinatorial space
    at compile time, avoids a lot of legacy board files that we cannot
    test anyway, reduces the total kernel size and gives an incentive
    for people to move forward to DT with their existing boards.

    The counterargument is that we won't be able to support all the
    boards we currently do when the user switches on multiplatform,
    but I think that is acceptable.
    Note that I would still want to allow users to build platforms
    separately in order to enable the ATAG style board files, even
    for platforms that are not multiplatform capable.

    Other opinions?


     \ /
      Last update: 2012-05-03 16:01    [W:0.021 / U:2.924 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site