[lkml]   [2012]   [May]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] net: compute a more reasonable default ip6_rt_max_size
On 5/25/12 8:39 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> But your patch is not a "modest increase", so whats the deal ?
> A modest increase would be 8192 instead of 4096, regardless of RAM size.

Yes - 8192 solves our immediate problem, but I was worrying that the
problem might resurface as ipv6 adoption becomes more widespread.

We were testing a pre-3.0 kernel that didn't have Dave's DST_NOCOUNT
patch. Will retest with that patch applied.

> More over, a boot parameter to tweak it is absolutely not needed

Agreed. Will remove that part.

Still not sure why you'd like to go for one size regardless of


 \ /
  Last update: 2012-05-27 06:41    [W:0.116 / U:1.616 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site