[lkml]   [2012]   [May]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] net: compute a more reasonable default ip6_rt_max_size
    On 5/25/12 8:39 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
    > But your patch is not a "modest increase", so whats the deal ?
    > A modest increase would be 8192 instead of 4096, regardless of RAM size.

    Yes - 8192 solves our immediate problem, but I was worrying that the
    problem might resurface as ipv6 adoption becomes more widespread.

    We were testing a pre-3.0 kernel that didn't have Dave's DST_NOCOUNT
    patch. Will retest with that patch applied.

    > More over, a boot parameter to tweak it is absolutely not needed

    Agreed. Will remove that part.

    Still not sure why you'd like to go for one size regardless of


     \ /
      Last update: 2012-05-27 06:41    [W:0.022 / U:8.736 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site