lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [May]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 13/20] arm: Do not call try_to_freeze() in do_signal()
Date
get_signal_to_deliver() already calls try_to_freeze(), there is no
need to call it directly.

Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
---
arch/arm/kernel/signal.c | 5 -----
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c b/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
index 434a1f3..aeebb46 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
@@ -10,7 +10,6 @@
#include <linux/errno.h>
#include <linux/signal.h>
#include <linux/personality.h>
-#include <linux/freezer.h>
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
#include <linux/tracehook.h>
#include <linux/irqflags.h>
@@ -636,9 +635,6 @@ static void do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs, int syscall)
}
}

- if (try_to_freeze())
- goto no_signal;
-
/*
* Get the signal to deliver. When running under ptrace, at this
* point the debugger may change all our registers ...
@@ -678,7 +674,6 @@ static void do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs, int syscall)
return;
}

- no_signal:
if (syscall) {
/*
* Handle restarting a different system call. As above,
--
1.7.7.3


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-05-26 01:41    [W:0.366 / U:0.116 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site