Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Richard Weinberger <> | Subject | [PATCH 13/20] arm: Do not call try_to_freeze() in do_signal() | Date | Sat, 26 May 2012 00:04:29 +0200 |
| |
get_signal_to_deliver() already calls try_to_freeze(), there is no need to call it directly.
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> --- arch/arm/kernel/signal.c | 5 ----- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c b/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c index 434a1f3..aeebb46 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c @@ -10,7 +10,6 @@ #include <linux/errno.h> #include <linux/signal.h> #include <linux/personality.h> -#include <linux/freezer.h> #include <linux/uaccess.h> #include <linux/tracehook.h> #include <linux/irqflags.h> @@ -636,9 +635,6 @@ static void do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs, int syscall) } } - if (try_to_freeze()) - goto no_signal; - /* * Get the signal to deliver. When running under ptrace, at this * point the debugger may change all our registers ... @@ -678,7 +674,6 @@ static void do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs, int syscall) return; } - no_signal: if (syscall) { /* * Handle restarting a different system call. As above, -- 1.7.7.3
| |