Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Fri, 25 May 2012 10:40:32 +0800 | | Subject | Re: [GIT PULL] x86/urgent fixes for v3.5 | | From | Chen <> |
| |
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:07 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote: > > Interesting posts, first the "500K scheduler" nonsense now > printk nonsense?
printk nonsense? You actually read my words wrong(LAUGH!) [I m going to quota my post] * Chen <hi3766691@gmail.com> wrote: > Everyone knows that this patch had been unstable. Also, too > much code are pushed into printk() with the patch > I mean that too much code are brought with the patch.
500K scheduler is true. 248K(Core.c[MODULAR]) + 148K(fair.c[CFS]) + 47K(rt.c[RT]) = 443K.(Does not include the other source files of scheduler.) It is really a *HUGE* CPU scheduler.[But it doesn't bring much advantages to desktop!!]
|  |