lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [May]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [GIT PULL] x86/urgent fixes for v3.5
From
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:07 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Interesting posts, first the "500K scheduler" nonsense now
> printk nonsense?

printk nonsense? You actually read my words wrong(LAUGH!)
[I m going to quota my post]
* Chen <hi3766691@gmail.com> wrote:
> Everyone knows that this patch had been unstable. Also, too
> much code are pushed into printk() with the patch
>
I mean that too much code are brought with the patch.

500K scheduler is true. 248K(Core.c[MODULAR]) + 148K(fair.c[CFS]) +
47K(rt.c[RT]) = 443K.(Does not include the other source files of
scheduler.) It is really a *HUGE* CPU scheduler.[But it doesn't bring
much advantages to desktop!!]


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-05-25 05:01    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans