lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [May]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: seccomp and ptrace. what is the correct order?
From
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:09 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
> On 05/22/2012 01:48 PM, Will Drewry wrote:
>>
>> That was my first thought too, so I ran a few simple tests.  gcc isn't
>> smart enough to not add ~344 bytes of code to get the number and
>> arguments for the x86/kernel/ptrace.c case I included (in the
>> naive-est of integrations).  But I don't know that it justifies the
>> extra patchwork or enforcing shared code across arches.
>>
>
> I suspect the construction of those inlines can be improved.

Seems likely - or just my use of them :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-05-22 23:41    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans