Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Tue, 22 May 2012 13:14:47 +0800 | | Subject | Re: Plumbers: Tweaking scheduler policy micro-conf RFP | | From | Chen <> |
| |
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Chen <hi3766691@gmail.com> wrote: > Still you are just trying to said that your code is not bloated? > Up to over 500K for a cpu scheduler. Laughing
So please stop increasing the size of cpu scheduler's code. Users can't benefit anything from that. Also the interactivity problem of scheduler is still exist though it improves a lot already.
It is better to stop bloating. Isn't ?
Also I m quite agree with Linus. The model of the scheduler now is complex and there are many *UNNECESSARY* code. I CAN'T REALLY BENEFIT ANYTHING. I just make my kernel with -j2 and the music is already sucking![Intel E7500, 2.9GHZ, two core]. It can show that how the interactivity problem is serious with mainline cpu scheduler. I know it is not all the fault of mainline cpu scheduler but it is still a big interactivity problem with it. [me think that Peter is proud of his insane-box-supporting stuff]
|  |