[lkml]   [2012]   [May]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRE: [PATCH] zsmalloc: use unsigned long instead of void *
> From: Seth Jennings []
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] zsmalloc: use unsigned long instead of void *
> On 05/20/2012 09:23 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > We should use unsigned long as handle instead of void * to avoid any
> > confusion. Without this, users may just treat zs_malloc return value as
> > a pointer and try to deference it.
> I wouldn't have agreed with you about the need for this change as people
> should understand a void * to be the address of some data with unknown
> structure.
> However, I recently discussed with Dan regarding his RAMster project
> where he assumed that the void * would be an address, and as such,
> 4-byte aligned. So he has masked two bits into the two LSBs of the
> handle for RAMster, which doesn't work with zsmalloc since the handle is
> not an address.
> So really we do need to convey as explicitly as possible to the user
> that the handle is an _opaque_ value about which no assumption can be made.

Someone once said: "Opaque is a computer science term and has no
meaning in system software and computer engineering." ;-)

 \ /
  Last update: 2012-05-21 17:41    [W:0.193 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site