lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [May]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] perf script/python: Pass thread/dso name and symbol info to event handler in python
On Thu, 17 May 2012 12:47:26 -0300
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> wrote:

> Em Wed, May 16, 2012 at 08:59:15PM +0800, Feng Tang escreveu:
> > Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
> > ---
> > .../util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> > 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.c
> > b/tools/perf/util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.c index
> > a202881..c96f5e2 100644 ---
> > a/tools/perf/util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.c +++
> > b/tools/perf/util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.c @@ -336,6 +336,7
> > @@ static void python_process_general_event(union perf_event *pevent
> > __unused, static char handler_name[64]; unsigned n = 0;
> > void *data = sample->raw_data;
> > + struct thread *thread = al->thread;
> >
> > t = PyTuple_New(MAX_FIELDS);
> > if (!t)
> > @@ -348,13 +349,21 @@ static void python_process_general_event(union
> > perf_event *pevent __unused, goto exit;
> > }
> >
> > - /* Pass 3 parameters: event_attr, perf_sample, raw data, thread
> > name */
> > + /* Pass parameters: attr, perf_sample, raw data, thread and dso
> > name */ PyTuple_SetItem(t, n++, PyString_FromStringAndSize(
> > (const char *)&evsel->attr, sizeof(evsel->attr)));
> > PyTuple_SetItem(t, n++, PyString_FromStringAndSize(
> > (const char *)sample, sizeof(*sample)));
> > PyTuple_SetItem(t, n++, PyString_FromStringAndSize(
> > data, sample->raw_size));
> > + PyTuple_SetItem(t, n++, PyString_FromString(thread->comm));
> > + PyTuple_SetItem(t, n++, PyString_FromString(al->map->dso->name));
> > +
> > + /* Pass the resolved symbol if there is, othersize pass "Unkown" */
> > + if (al->sym)
> > + PyTuple_SetItem(t, n++,
> > PyString_FromString(al->sym->name));
> > + else
> > + PyTuple_SetItem(t, n++, PyString_FromString("Unknown"));
>
> Isn't this getting a little bit convoluted?
>
> I.e. python has dictionaries, perhaps we could pass a dict instead of a
> tuple, in that case we would simply not add the "symbol" key.

IIRC, the PyObject_CallObjects() only accept "tuple" arguments, or did
you mean make the "symbol" a dict and an item of the "t" tuple?

I agree the symbol code is ugly, is following a little better?
PyTuple_SetItem(t, n++, PyString_FromString((al->sym) ? al->sym->name : "Unknown"));

Thanks,
Feng


>
> > if (_PyTuple_Resize(&t, n) == -1)
> > Py_FatalError("error resizing Python tuple");
> > --
> > 1.7.1


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-05-18 06:21    [W:0.161 / U:0.424 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site