lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [May]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH RFC 00/13] Lockd: grace period containerization
    On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:06:30PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
    > On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 09:21:30PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
    > > This patch set is marked with RFC, because I'm still not quite sure, that this
    > > implementation will satisfy other interested people.
    > > So, would be appreciated for any comments.
    > >
    > > This patch set makes grace period and hosts reclaiming network namespace
    > > aware.
    > >
    > > Main ideas:
    > > 1) moving of
    > >
    > > unsigned long next_gc;
    > > unsigned long nrhosts;
    > >
    > > struct delayed_work grace_period_end;
    > > struct lock_manager lockd_manager;
    > > struct list_head grace_list;
    > >
    > > to per-net Lockd data.
    > >
    > > 2) moving of
    > >
    > > struct lock_manager nfsd4_manager;
    > >
    > > to per-net NFSd data.
    > >
    > > 3) shutdown + gc of NLM hosts done now network namespace aware.
    >
    > That all sounds reasonable to me.
    >
    > > 4) restart_grace() now works only for init_net.
    >
    > Eventually we might just remove that. I doubt it's used anywhere.

    And on a quick skim I don't see anything wrong with the patches
    themselves; let me know when you consider them ready.

    The per-net grace period management probably isn't what we'll want
    eventually, but as I said on the other thread I think it's a reasonable
    starting point.

    --b.


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-05-16 23:21    [W:0.024 / U:14.072 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site