Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Perf record format portability | From | Steven Rostedt <> | Date | Wed, 16 May 2012 15:39:14 -0400 |
| |
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 15:32 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 19:48 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > > for ppc64(record) vs x86_64(report) I got following report on latest tip: > > > > [jolsa@dhcp-26-214 test]$ ../perf report > report.target > > Endianness of raw data not corrected! > > Warning: > > 718 samples with id not present in the header > > Warning: > > The perf.data file has no samples! > >
What does perf script give you. It looks like Frederic took my code for this when he ported the original parse-events over to perf. I see the setup of these variables in tools/perf/util/trace-event-read.c
If you run 'perf script' on x86 from a ppc perf.dat file, do you still get the same errors?
-- Steve
| |