lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [May]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Perf record format portability
From
Date
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 15:32 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 19:48 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>
> > for ppc64(record) vs x86_64(report) I got following report on latest tip:
> >
> > [jolsa@dhcp-26-214 test]$ ../perf report > report.target
> > Endianness of raw data not corrected!
> > Warning:
> > 718 samples with id not present in the header
> > Warning:
> > The perf.data file has no samples!
> >

What does perf script give you. It looks like Frederic took my code for
this when he ported the original parse-events over to perf. I see the
setup of these variables in tools/perf/util/trace-event-read.c

If you run 'perf script' on x86 from a ppc perf.dat file, do you still
get the same errors?

-- Steve




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-05-16 22:41    [W:0.167 / U:0.068 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site