lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [May]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] slub: fix a memory leak in get_partial_node()
From
2012/5/16 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>:
>> I read stable_kernel_rules.txt, this article tells me I must note
>> upstream commit ID.
>> Above patch is not included in upstream currently, so I can't find
>> upstream commit ID.
>> Is 'Acked-by from MAINTAINER' sufficient for submitting to stable-kernel?
>> Is below format right for stable submission format?
>
> No.
>
> Please read the second item in the list that says: "Procedure for
> submitting patches to the -stable tree" in the file,
> Documentation/stable_kernel_rulest.txt.  It states:
>
>  - To have the patch automatically included in the stable tree, add the tag
>     Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>   in the sign-off area. Once the patch is merged it will be applied to
>   the stable tree without anything else needing to be done by the author
>   or subsystem maintainer.
>
> Does that help?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Thanks, very helpful.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-05-16 18:01    [W:0.051 / U:30.892 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site