lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [May]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Perf record format portability
    On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:59:27AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
    > Adding Jiri and Steven to the CC list.
    >
    > Em Wed, May 16, 2012 at 02:50:31PM +0400, Dmitry Antipov escreveu:
    > > On 05/15/2012 07:51 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
    > > >Em Tue, May 15, 2012 at 07:27:39PM +0400, Dmitry Antipov escreveu:
    > > >>are there any thoughts on how much of the perf.data is portable and how much it should be?
    > > >>I'm interesting in recording scheduler activity on one machine and then replaying on
    > > >>another. As I can see, replaying x86 perf.data on ARM doesn't work. At least, should it
    > > >>work with a small subset of recorded events (for example, sched:sched_switch,
    > > >>sched:sched_process_exit, sched:sched_process_fork, sched:sched_wakeup
    > > >>and sched:sched_migrate_task) on the same architecture?
    > > >
    > > >Endianness issues? ARM EB? There are some patches by Jiri Olsa that may
    > > >help you if that is the case.

    latest version sent today, there's description of tests I did:
    http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=133715172512742&w=2

    Each time I run new sort of test, another endianity issue is hit.
    so, tracepoints.. I'll check ;)

    jirka


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-05-16 18:01    [W:0.025 / U:32.220 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site