Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 14 May 2012 14:27:53 -0700 | From | Tejun Heo <> | Subject | Re: linux-next oops in __lock_acquire for process_one_work |
| |
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:52:46AM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote: > On Wed, 9 May 2012, Hugh Dickins wrote: > > On Wed, 9 May 2012, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > * Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> wrote: > > > > > > > I'll set it going when I get home later - thanks. > > > > Going fine so far, but a more convincing final report tomorrow. > > Yes, as expected, Peter's patch (+ ,) is good: that load ran four > times longer than the longest it managed before without the patch. > Just needs Peter's signoff, I think.
Peter, can I take your patch with Hugh's description w/ your SOB?
Thanks.
-- tejun
| |