[lkml]   [2012]   [May]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH RESEND 1/3] printk: convert byte-buffer to variable-length record buffer
    On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 14:58 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Joe Perches <> wrote:
    > >
    > > I think it's a distinction without a difference for,
    > > as fas as I know, that's a case that doesn't exist
    > > in the current kernel.
    > So? Even if we hadn't had this bug before (we have),

    True. I've fixed the ones you've introduced when you
    changed printk semantics in the past.

    > your argument is utter crap.

    What happened to the pragmatic Linus Torvalds?
    Did the dogmatic one replace him again temporarily?

    > Even if we weren't to have that patter right *now*, that
    > doesn't mean that it cannot happen.

    Not what I said.

    > Your grep is also not at all exhaustive.

    I believe I know the printk subsystem and its uses
    as well as anyone. I don't think there is a case

    > We do need an escape model.

    Or an agreement to not to emit "<[0-7cd]>"
    as the first 3 bytes after a newline or as
    the start of a new printk. It could just
    as easily be an escape is a required leading
    non "<" character.

    I think that's not onerous.

    > The current KERN_CONT does that. Stop
    > arguing for crap.

    Correctness in all cases can be a good thing.
    Simplicity may be better because complexity
    is reduced.

    cheers, Joe

     \ /
      Last update: 2012-05-11 02:21    [W:0.022 / U:7.804 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site