lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [May]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/2] mfd: MAX8997: Support irq domain for Maxim MAX8997
    On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 08:45:23AM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
    > On 05/11/2012 03:20 AM, Greg KH wrote:
    >
    > > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 07:54:48PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
    > >> This patchset add support irq domain for Maxim MAX8997 interrupts.
    > >>
    > >> The first patch is based on patch written by Thomas Abraham and fix
    > >> two bug which set max8997->irq_domain instead of NULL pointer and
    > >> correct wrong parameter by Chanwoo Choi.
    > >> - https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/18/145
    > >> The second patch use irq domain for MAX8997 muic interrupt instead
    > >> of irq_base in platform data of MAX8997 driver.
    > >>
    > >> But, I posted following patchset related to MAX8997 driver.
    > >> This patchset support Extcon framework in extcon-max8997 driver to
    > >> control external connector instead of max8997-muic driver. So, first
    > >> patch add MAX8997 extcon driver(drivers/extcon/extcon-max8997.c) and
    > >> last patch remove old MAX8997 muic driver(drivers/misc/max8997-muic.c).
    > >> - https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/5/8/98
    > >>
    > >> This patchset was applied in below git repository of Greg Kroah-Hartman.
    > >> - http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/gregkh/driver-core.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/driver-core-next
    > >>
    > >> I think that this patchset should be applied on the git repository
    > >> of Greg Kroah-Hartman to remove possible conflict issue when merged.
    > >
    > > That's fine with me, should the MFD maintainer have been copied on this
    > > to get his signed-off-by on it?
    > >
    >
    > I knew that first patch written by Thomas Abraham has been already
    > confirmed ack message from MFD maintainer(Samuel Ortiz
    > <sameo@linux.intel.com>). You can check it on first patch and below git
    > repository of Mark Brown.

    Ok, but why didn't you cc: him and everyone else who acked and
    signed-off on that patch?

    > The below patch has occurred build break, so it was reverted by Mark
    > Brown. And then I did post this patchset with bug fix.
    >
    > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git;a=commit;h=98d8618af37728f6e18e84110ddb99987b47dd12

    So does that mean this one is ok, but the older one isn't?

    confused, what exactly should I do here?

    greg k-h


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-05-11 02:21    [W:0.046 / U:0.236 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site