Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 10 May 2012 16:52:37 -0700 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/2] mfd: MAX8997: Support irq domain for Maxim MAX8997 |
| |
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 08:45:23AM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > On 05/11/2012 03:20 AM, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 07:54:48PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > >> This patchset add support irq domain for Maxim MAX8997 interrupts. > >> > >> The first patch is based on patch written by Thomas Abraham and fix > >> two bug which set max8997->irq_domain instead of NULL pointer and > >> correct wrong parameter by Chanwoo Choi. > >> - https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/18/145 > >> The second patch use irq domain for MAX8997 muic interrupt instead > >> of irq_base in platform data of MAX8997 driver. > >> > >> But, I posted following patchset related to MAX8997 driver. > >> This patchset support Extcon framework in extcon-max8997 driver to > >> control external connector instead of max8997-muic driver. So, first > >> patch add MAX8997 extcon driver(drivers/extcon/extcon-max8997.c) and > >> last patch remove old MAX8997 muic driver(drivers/misc/max8997-muic.c). > >> - https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/5/8/98 > >> > >> This patchset was applied in below git repository of Greg Kroah-Hartman. > >> - http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/gregkh/driver-core.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/driver-core-next > >> > >> I think that this patchset should be applied on the git repository > >> of Greg Kroah-Hartman to remove possible conflict issue when merged. > > > > That's fine with me, should the MFD maintainer have been copied on this > > to get his signed-off-by on it? > > > > I knew that first patch written by Thomas Abraham has been already > confirmed ack message from MFD maintainer(Samuel Ortiz > <sameo@linux.intel.com>). You can check it on first patch and below git > repository of Mark Brown.
Ok, but why didn't you cc: him and everyone else who acked and signed-off on that patch?
> The below patch has occurred build break, so it was reverted by Mark > Brown. And then I did post this patchset with bug fix. > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git;a=commit;h=98d8618af37728f6e18e84110ddb99987b47dd12
So does that mean this one is ok, but the older one isn't?
confused, what exactly should I do here?
greg k-h
| |