lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [May]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [Bcache v13 11/16] bcache: Core btree code
From
I don't feel strongly one way or the other about it, but I do think
it's more just a matter of taste - the if (0) is ugly, I'll certainly
grant you that but IMO it makes the weird control flow harder to miss,
and the indentation more or less matches the control flow.
But I haven't come up with a way of writing that I actually like, I
dislike them all almost equally.

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 23:10 -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>
> []
>> +
>> +void btree_read_done(struct closure *cl)
>> +{
> []
>> +     if (b->written < btree_blocks(b))
>> +             bset_init_next(b);
>> +
>> +     if (0) {
>> +err:         set_btree_node_io_error(b);
>> +             cache_set_error(b->c, "%s at bucket %lu, block %zu, %u keys",
>> +                             err, PTR_BUCKET_NR(b->c, &b->key, 0),
>> +                             index(i, b), i->keys);
>> +     }
>
> Hi Kent
>
> trivia:  This if (0) is an exceedingly ugly style.
>
> I'd much prefer:
>
>        if (foo)
>                bar();
>
>        goto exit;
>
> err:
>        set_btree_node_io_error(b);
>        cache_set_error(b->c, "%s at bucket %lu, block %zu, %u keys",
>                        err, PTR_BUCKET_NR(b->c, &b->key, 0),
>                        index(i, b), i->keys);
>
> exit:
>        etc...
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-05-11 00:21    [W:0.838 / U:0.652 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site