Messages in this thread | | | From | Kay Sievers <> | Date | Thu, 10 May 2012 22:39:59 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/3] printk: convert byte-buffer to variable-length record buffer |
| |
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 16:14 -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote: >> Is there any difference in any of the cases in terms of how printk's >> that are prefixed with KERN_CONT versus a printk that does not have >> any KERN_* prefix? If so, is there value in keeping KERN_CONT? > > As far as I know, no. > > It is a useful marker to show where prints > are actually continued. > > #define KERN_CONT "" > > would save a small amount of text.
Nah, we can't do that. We need it to tell "here is your non-prefix to parse, leave the data behind alone".
Kay -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |