Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/3] printk: convert byte-buffer to variable-length record buffer | From | Joe Perches <> | Date | Thu, 10 May 2012 13:37:06 -0700 |
| |
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 16:14 -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote: > Is there any difference in any of the cases in terms of how printk's > that are prefixed with KERN_CONT versus a printk that does not have > any KERN_* prefix? If so, is there value in keeping KERN_CONT?
As far as I know, no.
It is a useful marker to show where prints are actually continued.
#define KERN_CONT ""
would save a small amount of text.
| |