lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [May]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 2/3] ARM: imx: Add imx5 cpuidle driver
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 09:27:02AM -0500, Rob Lee wrote:
> Sascha,
>
> >
> > This clk_get should go away here and be moved somewhere to
> > initialization. Also, if getting this clock fails we can still
> > do regular cpu_do_idle. Additionally, if clk_get fails, we'll
> > have a ERR_PTR value in gpc_dvfs_clk in which case the
> > gpc_dvfs_clk == NULL won't trigger next time you are here and
> > then you'll enable a nonexisting clock below.
> >
>
> Agree. I'd prefer to enable this clock during intialization and just
> leave it running. It is supposed to be a very low power clock and I
> couldn't measuring any power difference with and without it being
> enabled

Ok, even better.

> >
> > I wonder why you don't add the default ARM_CPUIDLE_WFI_STATE_PWR state.
> > The above is something different, right? It has a greater exit latency
> > than ARM_CPUIDLE_WFI_STATE_PWR, so why don't we add it here aswell?
>
> Yes and no. Yes this is a different state but no, it doesn't have a
> significantly greater exit latency, or at least a large enough exit
> latency to warrant an extra state in my opinion. According to the
> i.MX5 documentation, the extra exit time beyond basic WFI required for
> the "WAIT_UNCLOCKED_POWER_OFF" state is 500ns (this is due to a
> difference in i.MX5 hardware implementation compared to all other ARM
> platforms). In reality, it did require a few more microseconds to
> perform in my testing just based on the extra register writes in
> mx5_cpu_lp_set(). I'd like to clean up mx5_cpu_lp_set() and add a
> global variable to track the previous state and to just exit out if
> the new state is the same as the old.

Do you think it's worth it? You buy skipping the read with an additional
test.

> I could do this cleanup as part of this patchset if you prefer that.

Yes please. Cleanups before adding new features is always a good reason
to apply a patch series ;)

Sascha

--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-05-10 15:01    [W:0.051 / U:1.072 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site