[lkml]   [2012]   [May]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH v1 3/5] KVM: Add paravirt kvm_flush_tlb_others
On 05/01/2012 06:14 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 15:12 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >
> > What's changed is not gup_fast() but the performance of munmap(),
> > exit(), and exec(), no?
> If it is indeed cache related like you suggested earlier, it would be
> the allocation side of things, like fork()/mmap() that suffer since
> there's fewer hot pages about, but yes, anything creating/destroying
> page-tables.


> > What bounds the amount of memory waiting to be freed during an rcu grace
> > period?
> Most RCU implementations don't have limits, so that could be quite a
> lot. I think preemptible RCU has a batch limit at which point it tries
> rather hard to force a grace period, but I'm not sure if even that
> provides a hard limit.
> Practically though, I haven't had reports of PPC/Sparc going funny
> because of this.

It could be considered a DoS if a user is able to free page tables
faster than rcu is able to recycle them, possibly triggering the oom
killer (should that force a grace period before firing from the hip?)

error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

 \ /
  Last update: 2012-05-01 18:21    [W:0.109 / U:7.968 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site