lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    Date
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] module: Clarify usage of MODULE_LICENSE()
    On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com> wrote:
    > On 04/08/2012 06:46 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
    >>
    >>  include/linux/module.h |   17 +++++++++++++----
    >>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
    >>
    >> diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h
    >> index fbcafe2..8d36d86 100644
    >> --- a/include/linux/module.h
    >> +++ b/include/linux/module.h
    >> - * This exists for several reasons
    >> + * The MODULE_LICENSE() exists for several reasons:
    >> + * 0.   So EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() allows the module to use its symbols
    >
    >
    > It seems there is some tab/space mixup here.

    Ah yes, I'll send a v3.

    > Also not sure if the above statement is clear or correct.
    > Correct me if I am wrong, but I thought it
    > put a requirement on other modules to be able to use its symbols.

    Never heard of this but boy, wouldn't that be nice.

    Luis
    --
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-04-09 14:39    [W:0.022 / U:0.876 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site