[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] module: Clarify GPL-Compatible is OK
    > > Dual licensing avoids some confusions, it also removes the worry about
    > > possible unanticipated incompatibility. Right now if a court somewhere
    > > says "Hey you know what - BSD and GPL are not compatible because XYZ" the
    > > fact it is dual licensed avoids problems.
    > Interesting, I had not considered that case, is this really likely to
    > happen now, I mean at least with the list of licenses listed as
    > GPL-Compatible on the FSF site?

    I would be very surprised - but why chance it ?

    > in perspective to what extent do we want to remain speculative over
    > the list the FSF provides on GPL-Compatibility for the Linux kernel?
    > Are there, say, at least a few GPL-Compatible licenses which we are
    > comfortable with in assuming GPL-Compatibility moving forward?

    IMHO it's up to whoever wants another tag badly enough to submit a change
    for it. Consider it optimising the problem by delayed evaluation.


     \ /
      Last update: 2012-04-08 19:13    [W:0.020 / U:1.068 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site