lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] module: Clarify GPL-Compatible is OK
    On 04/07/2012 09:03 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
    >> You do not need to make dual licenses when licenses are compatible
    >> with each other, and in fact at times this can confuse developers / legal.
    >
    > Firstly you are out of order touching the licensing tags of other vendors
    > code. Absolutely and utterly. So nobody should for example be touching an
    > Intel MODULE_LICENSE() tag without the say so of Intel legal.

    As the patch also includes driver code that Broadcom contributed to the
    kernel, I am inclined to agree. But to me it is not clear whether the
    MODULE_LICENSE() tag holds a true legal value. How does it relate to the
    legal disclaimer that is (probably) in each and every source file?

    Gr. AvS



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-04-08 14:51    [W:0.020 / U:90.160 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site