[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Input: eeti_ts: Mark as CONFIG_BROKEN
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Olof Johansson <> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Sven Neumann <> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> On 07.04.12 09:02, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 10:40:07PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
>>>> This seems to have been broken since 2010, so obviously noone actually
>>>> cares about the driver:
>>>> make[4]: *** [drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.o] Error 1
>>>> drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c: In function 'eeti_ts_irq_active':
>>>> drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c:65:2: error: implicit declaration of
>>>> function 'irq_to_gpio' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>>> irq_to_gpio isn't available on most platforms today, so the driver
>>>> will need some rework by someone who has hardware access and can test
>>>> (to make sure that, for example, switching to level interrupts and just
>>>> keep taking them while there's more to process works).
>>>> I guess it could just be scheduled for removal, but let's start with
>>>> marking it CONFIG_BROKEN.
>>> Well, it probably works quite well on arches that do have irq_to_gpio(),
>>> let's ask Daniel and Sven if they still have this hardware and if they
>>> can try the patch below that implements what you suggested.
>> This hardware is still in use and we also still follow kernel development
>> and try to update our customer devices to recent kernel versions regularly.
>> Currently we are at 3.1.10 and the touchscreen works well with that. I'll
>> try to update to a more recent kernel next week and will try your patch.
> Ah, you're right, and this was my bad. Looks like this change was
> introduced in 3.2 and broke this and one more driver (ezx-pcap):
> Author:     Haojian Zhuang <>
> AuthorDate: Mon Oct 10 16:03:51 2011 +0800
> Commit:     Haojian Zhuang <>
> CommitDate: Mon Nov 14 21:07:59 2011 +0800
>    ARM: pxa: rename gpio_to_irq and irq_to_gpio
>    Avoid to define gpio_to_irq() and irq_to_gpio() for potential name
>    confliction since multiple architecture will be built together.
>    Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <>
> Haojian, I think it was probably premature to do the multiplatform
> change like that, since it means that a PXA-only kernel has no mapping
> from irq_to_gpio to pxa_irq_to_gpio. Can you please address this as a
> fix for 3.4?
> Thanks,
> -Olof

It's the same story with AT91. Here irq_to_gpio was also removed some
time ago. I believe it's the same for a lot of other ARM architectures
Currently there 7 drivers that uses irq_to_gpio, these are obviously
broken on architectures that not provide the function.

I think it would be better to fix the drivers rather than resurrect
irq_to_gpio on the individual architectures.

Users of irq_to_gpio in drivers:
pata_rb532_cf, eeti_ts, egalax_ts, ezx-pcap, db1xxx_ss, tosa_battery, lis3l02dq

Joachim Eastwood

> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to
> More majordomo info at
> Please read the FAQ at
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2012-04-07 23:09    [W:0.098 / U:11.196 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site