[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: RCU related performance regression in 3.3
> Message du 05/04/12 16:40
> De : "Paul E. McKenney"
> A : "Pascal CHAPPERON"
> Copie à : "Josh Boyer" ,,
> Objet : Re: RCU related performance regression in 3.3
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 04:15:33PM +0200, Pascal CHAPPERON wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I didn't notice any significant slowdown while the system is up and running.
A full kernel compilation (make -j 16) takes 14mn with both 3.2.10 and 3.3.0.
> OK, so the natural approach is to disable CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ at
> boot time. Unfortunately, you appear to need it to remain disabled
> through at least filesystem mounting, which if I understand correctly
> happens long after system_state gets set to SYSTEM_RUNNING.
In fact, I need it to remain disable until all the systemd units are completed.
Some units, such as NetworkManager can take longer time to complete with
RCU_FAST_NO_HZ enabled.
And i need it to be disabled at shutdown, as umounting cgroups, sysfs, etc.
plus old-root mounting can take one plain second for each umounting.

> If RCU has some way to find out when init is complete, I can easily
> make it so that CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ optimizes for speed during boot
> and energy efficiency during runtime.
I said that I didn't noticed significant slowdown during runtime, but my
laptop usage is basic. Some specific tasks similar to systemd may
perhaps be impacted by this feature.
I can test a task/program that could stress RCU_FAST_NO_HZ if any ?

> One thing I could easily do would be to provide a sysfs parameter or
> some such that allows the boot process to enable energy-efficiency
> mode at runtime. I would much prefer to make this automatic, though.
So the feature is disabled until you trigger a sysfs parameter, and can be
disabled before shutdown ? It would be fair, at least for hardware like my

> Other thoughts?
Do you think that the culprit is a buggy hardware in my laptop, or the
number of cpu/threads ?

> Thanx, Paul

Resent in plain text because rejected. Sorry, i forgot the rules.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2012-04-06 11:21    [W:0.094 / U:4.288 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site