lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH] hrtimers: system-wide and per-task hrtimer slacks
On 04/05/2012 04:10 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:

> Well.. there are some back-incompatibilities here.
> prctl(PR_SET_TIMERSLACK, -1) used to restore current's slack setting to
> whatever-we-inherited-at-fork, but that has been removed. What are the
> implications of this, and did we need to do it?

It seems you're looking at the previous version of this patch
(http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/20/55). Latest proposal is
http://lwn.net/Articles/484162/, which defines PR_SET_TIMERSLACK
action as:
...
case PR_SET_TIMERSLACK:
if (arg2 <= 0)
current->timer_slack_ns =
default_timer_slack_ns;
else if (arg2 <= HRTIMER_MAX_SLACK)
current->timer_slack_ns = arg2;
else
error = -EINVAL;
break;
...

> If we do make changes in this area then the prctl manpage should be
> updated, please. And if
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-man/msg01149.html represents the
> current state of that manpage then it should be updated anyway - that
> entry doesn't say anything about the (arg2<= 0) case.

I sent a patch for man pages too, it should be one of the recent posts
at http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-man/index.html.

Dmitry




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-04-06 11:17    [W:0.081 / U:0.184 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site