lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] nextfd(2)
(4/4/12 9:43 AM), Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 12:38, KOSAKI Motohiro<kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com> wrote:
>> As far as I understand, any major open source project don't use
>> posix_spawn().
>> Please remind, I'm talking about real world issue.
>
> This doesn't mean they shouldn't. If you require code to be changed
> anyway let them change to something which doesn't require more cruft
> in the kernel. The limitations you cited are irrelevant for
> posix_spawn. And perhaps there will be actually spawn support in the
> kernel which would make dealing with OOM situations and non-overcommit
> much easier.

Umm... I'm sorry. I haven't catch why OOM is related topic. Could you please
elaborate more?




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-04-04 19:09    [W:0.082 / U:2.880 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site