lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] printk(): add KERN_CONT where needed
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 18:05, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 17:50 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> I did not claim to address the problem of concurrent continuation line
>> writers, and this patch has absolutely nothing to do with that
>> problem. It _does_ fix encountered problems,
>
> No it doesn't.  It fixes problems _you_ encounter
> with an unpublished modification of the printk
> subsystem.

Exactly. And that is what is written in the changelog of the patch.
But all that does not matter, the change results in more correct code
than the current one is; and that is all that matters.

Sure, I see your point, and support your effort, but I don't think
your arguments are related to this patch and you are hijacking
something unrelated, which should be discussed in a separate mail
thread, that's all.

Thanks,
Kay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-04-03 18:15    [W:0.125 / U:0.344 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site