lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 5/6] rcu: Make __kfree_rcu() less dependent on compiler choices
From
Date
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 15:29 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Thursday 2012-04-26 14:48, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 09:42 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >> Currently, __kfree_rcu() is implemented as an inline function, and
> >> contains a BUILD_BUG_ON() that malfunctions if __kfree_rcu() is compiled
> >> as an out-of-line function. Unfortunately, there are compiler settings
> >> (e.g., -O0) that can result in __kfree_rcu() being compiled out of line,
> >> resulting in annoying build breakage. This commit therefore converts
> >> both __kfree_rcu() and __is_kfree_rcu_offset() from inline functions to
> >> macros to prevent such misbehavior on the part of the compiler.
> >
> >The kernel very explicitly doesn't support being compiled with -O0, so
> >this is a non-issue, I think you can make it work if you add
> >-finline-functions.
> >
> >I'd drop this, either make the entire kernel compile or don't bother.
>
> It was not originally meant to make the entire kernel compile with -O0,
> but only select modules/.c files.

Same problem, who cares about select modules/.c files? Why should they
have different rules?

> That, or __always_inline just does not always inline.

It does indeed not without -finline-functions.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-04-26 15:53    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site