Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:01:18 +0200 | From | Wolfram Sang <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH V1 2/2] i2c: tegra: support for I2C_M_NOSTART protocol mangling |
| |
> > * We should allocate a new functionality flag for it. > > * We should update the documentation to reflect the two use cases. > > That sounds like a good plan. I'll try to get round to it if nobody > beats me to it.
Would it make sense to make all four I2C_M_* mangling features seperate I2C_FUNC_* options? The old I2C_FUNC_PROTOCOL_MANGLING could then be all four (seperately) exposed mangling features ORed. That's what I was wondering when looking at the patch.
Regards,
Wolfram
-- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |