[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch 00/18] SMP: Boot and CPU hotplug refactoring - Part 1
On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 08:42 -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> I'm still leaning towards restricting kthreadd and any PF_THREAD_BOUND
> threads in the root cgroup.

I'd definitely agree with restricting those.

> I'm not sure about !BOUND kthreads tho.
> It doesn't make sense for the most part but there are cases
> (e.g. crypto kthreads) which might make some sense.
Agreed as well. There are a few nasty corner cases with unbound
workqueues vs allowing cgroups (as how to place new worker threads
correctly etc..). Sorting that is a 'fun' next problem.

Could we merge the kthreadd/PF_THREAD_BOUND restriction? You've got my
ACK and I'm fairly sure tglx will ACK it as well.

 \ /
  Last update: 2012-04-20 17:51    [W:0.080 / U:3.356 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site