[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC V6 0/11] Paravirtualized ticketlocks
    On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 23:07 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
    > So if we need to fiddle with the scheduler and frankly that's the only
    > way to get a real gain (the numbers, which are achieved by this
    > patches, are not that impressive) then the question arises whether we
    > should turn the whole thing around.

    It probably doesn't materially effect your core point (which seems valid
    to me) but it's worth pointing out that the numbers presented in this
    thread are AFAICT mostly focused on ensuring that that the impact of
    this infrastructure is acceptable on native rather than showing the
    benefits for virtualized workloads.


     \ /
      Last update: 2012-04-02 11:45    [W:0.018 / U:0.672 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site