[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFD] Merge task counter into memcg
    (2012/04/18 1:52), Glauber Costa wrote:

    >>> In short, I don't think it's better to have task-counting and fd-counting in memcg.
    >>> It's kmem, but it's more than that, I think.
    >>> Please provide subsys like ulimit.
    >> So, you think that while kmem would be enough to prevent fork-bombs,
    >> it would still make sense to limit in more traditional ways
    >> (ie. ulimit style object limits). Hmmm....
    > I personally think this is namespaces business, not cgroups.
    > If you have a process namespace, an interface that works to limit the
    > number of processes should keep working given the constraints you are
    > given.
    > What doesn't make sense, is to create a *new* interface to limit
    > something that doesn't really need to be limited, just because you
    > limited a similar resource before.

    Ok, limitiing forkbomb is unnecessary. ulimit+namespace should work.
    What we need is user-id namespace, isn't it ? If we have that, ulimit
    works enough fine, no overheads.


     \ /
      Last update: 2012-04-18 22:37    [W:0.022 / U:32.136 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site