lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH] s390: mm: rmap: Transfer storage key to struct page under the page lock
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 08:52:21PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > > (You do remind me that I meant years ago to switch swapper_space over
> > > to the much simpler __set_page_dirty_no_writeback(), which shmem has
> > > used for ages; but as far as this problem goes, that would probably
> > > be at best a workaround, rather than the proper fix.)
> >
> > It would be a workaround. If in the future we wanted to treat swapper
> > space more like a normal file inode and writeback dirty pages from
> > the flusher thread then this bug would just pop its head back up.
>
> It's a no-brainer workaround: patch and more explanation below. I
> can double-fix it if you prefer, but the one-liner appeals more to me.
>

Ok, fair enough. While I think swapper space will eventually use the dirty
tag information that day is not today.

> > > Hmm, mm/migrate.c.
> >
> > Migration moves the page mapping under the tree lock so
> > __set_page_dirty_nobuffers() I don't think that is it.
>
> Yes, I was worried by the places that set page->mapping = NULL in
> migrate.c (later, not under the tree_lock), but those would not be able
> to generate this issue at all (ptes already replaced by migration entries).
>

Yes.

> <SNIP>
>
> [PATCH] mm: fix s390 BUG by using __set_page_dirty_no_writeback on swap
>
> Mel reports a BUG_ON(slot == NULL) in radix_tree_tag_set() on s390 3.0.13:
> called from __set_page_dirty_nobuffers() when page_remove_rmap() tries to
> transfer dirty flag from s390 storage key to struct page and radix_tree.
>
> That would be because of reclaim's shrink_page_list() calling add_to_swap()
> on this page at the same time: first PageSwapCache is set (causing
> page_mapping(page) to appear as &swapper_space), then page->private set,
> then tree_lock taken, then page inserted into radix_tree - so there's
> an interval before taking the lock when the radix_tree slot is empty.
>

Yes, makes sense.

> We could fix this by moving __add_to_swap_cache()'s spin_lock_irq up
> before SetPageSwapCache, with error case ClearPageSwapCache moved up
> under tree_lock too.
>

This can be done if/when swapper_space can make proper use of the dirty
tag information.

> But a better fix is just to do what's five years overdue. Ken Chen
> added __set_page_dirty_no_writeback() (if !PageDirty TestSetPageDirty)
> for tmpfs to skip all that radix_tree overhead, and swap is just the same:
> it ignores the radix_tree tag, and does not participate in dirty page
> accounting, so should be using __set_page_dirty_no_writeback() too.
>
> Reported-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>

Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>

I've sent a kernel based on this patch to the s390 folk that originally
reported the bug. Hopefully they'll test and get back to me in a few
days.

Thanks Hugh.

--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-04-18 22:37    [W:0.083 / U:0.276 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site