Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:56:53 +0200 (CEST) | From | Thomas Gleixner <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/3] Added new Proc entry to display per-cpu interrupts |
| |
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012, Sasikantha babu wrote:
Sigh. I told you before, that a subject line of a patch which starts with: "Added ..." is useless.
Please use the proper prefix for the subsystem and a reasonable subject.
> As the number of cores increases the output of the /proc/interrupts losing the readability. >
And please use a proper mail client which does line wraps around 78 chars.
> As the number of cores increases the output of the /proc/interrupts > losing the readability.
That's how it should look like.
> I think instead of showing complete information of all cores in a > single proc file spliting the information based on per-CPU will be > more useful (especially for people who wants to track per-cpu > information in real-time systems).
That has nothing to do with real time systems. /proc/interrupts is unreadable on any machine with a large number of cores.
What the heck is wrong with
cat /proc/interrupts | grep $YOUR_IRQ_OF_INTEREST | awk '{ print $CPU_ROW }'
Thanks,
tglx
| |