Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:27:44 +0800 | From | Xiao Guangrong <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 05/16] KVM: MMU: abstract spte write-protect |
| |
On 04/14/2012 10:26 AM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:11:45 +0800 > Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > >> +/* Return true if the spte is dropped. */ > > Return value does not correspond with the function name so it is confusing. >
That is why i put comment here.
> People may think that true means write protection has been done. >
You have a better name?
| |