Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 14 Apr 2012 09:52:42 -0700 | From | "Paul E. McKenney" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC 0/7] rcu: v2 Inlinable preemptible rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock() |
| |
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 09:38:50AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Paul E. McKenney > <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > This series is version two of the inlinable versions of preemptible > > RCU's __rcu_read_lock() and __rcu_read_unlock(). > > Btw, what is this supposed to apply on top of? It doesn't seem to > apply cleanly to either v3.3, v3.4-rc[12], or current top-of-tree. > > I can make it apply by reducing the context to just one line for > patch#6, but your base seems to be odd.
My next step is to forward-port to 4.4-rc2, retest, and expose to -next. The base is on top of the series that was pulled into the 4.4 merge window, but on their base on top of 3.4-rc4.
I probably should have forward-ported before submitting, but I was so happy about it finally actually passing a moderate version of the full set of rcutorture tests that I just couldn't restrain myself.
Thanx, Paul
| |