lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] perf/probe: Provide perf interface for uprobes
    Em Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 03:27:55PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
    > (2012/04/13 0:10), Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
    > >> $ perf probe libc malloc
    > >>
    > >> Makes it even easier to use.
    > >>
    > >> Its just when one asks for something that has ambiguities that
    > >> the tool should ask the user to be a bit more precise to remove such
    > >> ambiguity.
    > >>
    > >> After all...

    > > Another case
    > > perf probe do_fork clone_flags now looks for variable clone_flags in
    > > kernel function do_fork.

    > > But if we allow to trace perf probe zsh zfree; then
    > > 'perf probe do_fork clone_flags' should it check for do_fork executable
    > > or not? If it does check and finds one, and searches for clone_flags
    > > function and doesnt find, then should it continue with searching the
    > > kernel?

    > Agree. I'd like to suggest you to start with only full path support,
    > and see, how we can handle abbreviations :)

    Agreed, I was just making usability suggestions.

    Those can be implemented later, if we agree they ease the tool use.

    - Arnaldo


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-04-14 03:17    [W:0.040 / U:0.476 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site