lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/13] common clk framework misc fixes
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:14:38AM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 12 April 2012, Mike Turquette wrote:
> > This series collects many of the fixes posted for the recently merged
> > common clock framework as well as some general clean-up. Most of the
> > code classifies as a clean-up moreso than a bug fix; hopefully this is
> > not a problem since the common clk framework is new code pulled for 3.4.
> > Patches are based on v3.4-rc2 and can be pulled from:
> > git://git.linaro.org/people/mturquette/linux.git v3.4-rc2-clk-fixes
> >
> > Please let me know I missed any critical fixes that were posted to the
> > list already.
> >
> > Arnd & Olof, if there are no objections to these changes can this get
> > pulled through the arm-soc tree?
>
> I think pulling it in through the arm-soc tree is still ok, but it's
> borderline because of the size and patch 13 is probably too big,
> in addition to the comments that were made there.
>
> Let's pull patches 1 through 12 in to a separate series that we don't
> mix with the other bug fixes. Mike, please send a pull request with the
> Acks added in.
>
I just appended 3 more patches to the series. Patches #1 and #2 change
the interface between clk core and clk drivers - clk_ops a little bit,
(this is something Mike acked a couple of weeks ago, but missed from
the series) and patch #3 is a critical bug fix. So unless we can send
the whole series for -rc, I'd vote we send none of them for -rc.
Instead, we can stabilize it somewhere and ask all the clk driver
porting base on that.

Sending part of the cleanup/fixup and leaving the other that could
require changes on clk drivers out is a bad idea to me.

--
Regards,
Shawn


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-04-12 15:15    [W:0.122 / U:0.652 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site